Amazon MP3’s

April 18, 2008

Oh How The Mighty Have Fallen Okay… big question to you iTunes weenies… why iTunes? In my quest for a pure Open Source system, I got stuck on iTunes since that’s been my sole source to buy digital music. But I’ve never liked the iTunes interface and hated that I couldn’t take my music to any computer and play it (especially since I have a computer in just about every room of my home).

Enter Amazon.

I just used the Amazon MP3 service. Same price as iTunes… and I got high quality MP3 files that I was able to put on my internal file server and use on all my computers… including my soon-to-be-installed Linux desktop. It appears that Amazon, unlike Apple, actually wrote a Linux client for their service.

Niiiiiiiice…

I’m currently enjoying The Choir’s, O How The Might Have Fallen. As MP3’s. Purchased from Amazon.

Posted in Technobabble

I think I’m turning Open Source, I really think so…

TuxI like Windows XP. I really do. But Microsoft seems bent on ditching a decent operating system for Vista despite calls from them to be rational. I’ve talked to several people about their Vista experience and only two have had favorable results. And, of course, they have good reason - they both have Quad Processor, 2thz CPU, 200gig ram, 50 gig video monstrosities of machines. I believe their lights dim when they turn their respective machines on. Okay, slight exaggeration, but not much.

I really, really don’t want to spend a zillion dollars on new machines, plus whatever they want for a semi-professional version Vista, just because Microsoft wants pretty windows that zip around when you switch applications. And on top of all that, now all my MS Window weeny friends are buying macs. Hmmmmm… more hardware.

Well, I’ve decided to take the Open Source plunge again and try Linux on the desktop. My studio computer will still be stuck in XP land, but it took me 5 years to upgrade it from Windows 98, so I’ve got a few good years on it, yet.

My laptop, on the other hand, is my development and office productivity computer. That’s where I intend to switch to Linux. So I’ve made a list of things I need to do. These are MS-centric programs and behaviors that need to either change or be addressed before I can go Linux on my laptop. My goal? 100% free software.

  1. MS Office - I’ll admit it. I like Office. It just works. Everyone else uses it. I use it at work. Open Office has made some great strides recently and I’ll have to see if it cuts the mustard for me. I know people have MS Office working under Linux, but my goal is 100% free software.
  2. MS Outlook - I’ll admit this, too. I like Outlook. Not Outlook express - the full Outlook. It’s the perfect PIM in my mind… and it synchronizes well with my PDA. I’ve used Gnome’s Evolution, but I always seemed to have issues with it. I can’t remember why. I’ll either try it, or I’ll try Mozilla’s new Lightning project. It’s being funded by Open Office and looks a little nicer. Plus, I think I can synchronize with Google Calendar with it.
  3. Secure USB Key - this I actually have working on free software, though I haven’t gotten it running under Linux, yet. I don’t think that will be an issue
  4. Development - I use Eclipse to do my development, so hopefully that will be a non-issue. I do recall having problems getting my PHP extensions working under Debian, but that was almost 4 years ago.
  5. PDF’s - My laptop actually came with a paid license to Adobe Acrobat. I don’t actually use it (or know what it does for that matter), but I do use the PDF “printer” feature that lets me “print” to a PDF. I use that to send invoices to my clients. It appears that Open Office has the ability to actually “Save As” to a PDF format, so hopefully that will come through for me.
  6. DOS Box - Yea, I got on this retro kick and started playing old video games from my youth. Most of the shareware stuff from 3D Realms (formerly Apogee) is still for-pay, but things are a lot cheaper. One game I really liked was Crystal Caves (yea, that dates me). It used to be $35+ to buy the whole set. Now I can downloaded it for $10. I bought it. I love it. I want to keep using it. DOS Box is an excellent DOS emulator that emulates the old machines DOS would run on as well as the operating system. All the old games, Commander Keen, Crystal Caves, Monster Bash, Duke Nukem… even Wolfenstein 3D, all work very well under Dos Box - even the sound. I see there’s a version for Linux… hopefully it will work.
  7. WinAmp - I have all my MP3’s on my laptop. I’m moving them to a secure file server that’s inside my firewall to free them from my laptop, but I need a decent media player. Not just a media player. A good media player. I like WinAmp. I use WinAmp. Heck, I paid for WinAmp. I will miss WinAmp. So far, all the media players I’ve used in Linux have sucked eggs. Hopefully that’s changed.
  8. Imaging Tools - Ah, the bane of Linux. Before someone mentions the Gimp - please know that I detest the Gimp. What a great idea that’s never been implemented right. I’m serious. I want to draw and manipulate my pictures with a graphing tool - not a scripting tool. I know the Gimp has a lot of power, but it’s just not very accessible from the GUI. I haven’t used the Gimp in years, so maybe it’s better, but I’m not holding my breath.

That’s it for now. I’ll probably have more as time goes on. My goal is to go over my laptop with a fine toothed comb to back up all my data and find what programs I have lurking about that I never use but can’t live without. I’ve tried a few Live CD’s of Ubuntu (and friends), but I’m having a horrible time getting my wireless controller working. That’s apparently been a standard issue for Linux users for a while. If I can’t get it working, I’ll be stuck.

Posted in Technobabble

Bye, bye, U3.

April 14, 2008

A while ago, my wife bought me a SanDisk Cruiser 4GB USB flash drive. The thing works pretty well, but for encryption, it uses SanDisk’s proprietary U3 software. U3 is nice and all, but it locked me into the Windows platform and I always seemed to have issues getting it to run on machines that I hadn’t already tooled around with.

I’ve been considering moving off the Windows platform on my development laptop, but the two things that have kept me on Windows was the Office suite (believe it or not… I like it) and the U3 software. I started looking around at other secure USB flash drives to see if anything would work with Linux and I couldn’t really find anything pre-installed. But everyone pointed to an open-source software package called “TrueCrypt.”

I considered getting another flash drive and installing TrueCrypt on it as a second, more platform independent data solution. However, I got to thinking… Do I really use the U3 software? It has a sync feature that is nice, but you can only sync a profile to a single machine. So I didn’t use it - ever. I just copied my documents to the flash drive periodically and called it a sync! So I decided to ditch it.

Thankfully, SanDisk did something rare for a hardware manufacturer… they actually listened to their customers. They put an uninstaller for the U3 software that will remove the “secret” partition on the drive and free it up to act just like a standard flash drive.

So, I backed up my files, uninstalled U3, and installed TrueCrypt on it. REAL tough… you copy the files to the drive. Phew… tough.

I ran TrueCrypt. It works by creating a file on the unencrypted partition that acts as a data store for an encrypted partition. The TrueCrypt drivers then use that data store and de/encrypt data from/to that file in real time as you use the encrypted “drive”. Through some relatively easy menu options, I was able to set up a drive that automatically mounted when I fired up TrueCrypt from the USB drive. There’s an “autorun.inf” file on the drive, but it doesn’t seem to want to run. So I just created a batch file that ran the same command.

So, now, all I have to do is stick the drive in, let the unencrypted drive mount, then run the “start.bat” file that I created in the root. TrueCrypt asks for my password and another drive mounts with my encrypted data.

Niiiiiiiiice…

Next up… trying it with Linux.

Oh, and if you’re wondering about where I’m going with the Office suite, I’m looking at IBM’s Symphony. It’s basically a nice facade to OpenOffice.

And for those who know me, you know that I’m Outlook junkie. Yea, yea… don’t bug me about it. Hey, I can’t find any other package that integrates contacts, emails, and calendars as well as Outlook. Well, except for Evolution. I used Evolution a bit when I was trying the Linux desktop thing once before. I’ll have to give it another go. I did hear from someone that Thunderbird has a calendar plug-in. I’ll have to see how well it works. I mainly need something that I can sync with my PDA…

I’ll post more my Linux Desktop migration again as it progresses. My main drive is a slightly unfounded fear of Vista.

Posted in Technobabble

CFL’s Are Good, But Not Perfect

April 25, 2007

CFLI’ve been considering replacing our incandescent light bulbs with CFL’s (compact fluorescent light bulbs) for quite a while, now. After looking at the whole CFL vs. Incandescent light bulb debate on the internet, I’ve noticed there’s a lot of neigh-sayers against CFL’s.

Here’s the problems some people have noted about CFL’s:

1) CFL’s aren’t as bright.

Not true.

Yes, there are probably some brands that are not as bright, but in general, I’ve found CFL’s to be brighter. The manufacturers mark the CFL’s with their incandescent equivalent. In most cases, the CFL’s I’ve purchased have been much brighter than I expected (based on their incandescent rating). In fact, some have been too bright. One case, however, (the 20w equivalents) I noticed the bulbs were not as bright.

I’ve been using bulbs made by “Feit Electronics” (from Menard’s) and “n:Vision” (from Home Depot) mostly, as well as a few from “Sylvania” (also from Menard’s). They have all been much brighter than I expected (except for the candelabra bulbs).

Also, take note of what category of bulb you’re looking at.

- Soft White: This is the closest thing to a warm incandescent that I’ve found. I like these and they represent 95% of my bulbs.

- Bright White: The Sylvania bulbs are the only bright white bulbs I bought (since they were on sale). VERY bright. MUCH brighter than the incandescent equivalent. I actually don’t like these much. They remind me of traditional fluorescent bulbs.

- Daylight: These are supposed to mimic sunlight. They’re more expensive. I have one, and it’s nothing to write home about.

2) CFL’s can’t be dimmed.

Actually, there are some that can. However, they’re more expensive.

Look, if this is the only reason you don’t change to CFL’s, then you don’t get the point behind the switch. Really. Have a dimmer? Fine. Put CFL’s everywhere else if you can and keep the incandescent on the dimmer circuit. You can still save money.

3) CFL’s have mercury in them.

If you don’t have a recycling center that will take CFL’s in your town, don’t change. You do not want to throw these things away in the regular trash. I’m not a big environmentalist, but even I don’t want to put this kind of stuff in the landfills. But if you do, you can’t really use that as a reason not to switch. An extra trip to the recycling center is worth the savings on your electric bill.

4) CFL’s don’t come on right away and they take a while to warm up.

Yea, so? Again, it depends on the manufacturer. Mine come on in about 1/4 seconds. Whoopie. I can live with that. If that’s too long for you, you might need to lay off the caffeine.

These are not like those old circular fluorescent bulbs. Those things took, like, 3 seconds to come on. And they flickered something fierce. CFL’s do take a while to come to full brightness when they’ve been off for a while, but you can still see from the initial light.

And frankly, lights don’t get turned off nearly enough around my house to count warm-up time. That’s why I went with CFL’s in the first place. I figure if I can’t get people to turn the lights off, I can at least cut down on their power consumption.

And as an added bonus, the CFL’s in my bathroom don’t shock my system in the middle of the night. Consequently, the 60W equivalent CFL’s in my bathroom are waaaay brighter than the 60W incandescents I had in there.

5) CFL’s don’t last as long as advertised.

The jury’s out on that one for me. I just got started. If they only last a year, I won’t be happy (when they advertise a 5-7 year lifespan). But even if they last 2-3 years, I’m still ahead of the game - assuming that I pay less for power. Shoot, I was changing my incandescents (especially the candelabra bulbs) every month! Granted - not all at the same time, but bulbs were only lasting about 8 months.

6) CFL’s cause seizures.

If this is an issue for you… then don’t buy them. And avoid malls and business offices, too. I’m pretty sure they use fluorescent bulbs, too, and they’re flashing is much worse than any of the CFL’s I’ve seen.

7) CFL’s give me headaches.

When was the last time you used one? The CFL’s you can buy today are not like the ones coming out even a few years ago. And they are certainly not like the old standard fluorescent bulbs with standard light sockets from the last couple of decades. You know… those circular deals. Those even gave me headaches.

8) CFL’s don’t work well in cold weather.

Very true.

That’s why I don’t have any CFL’s outside. CFL’s are great, but not the perfect choice for every light socket. Outside - CFL’s just don’t cut the mustard (unless you live in the South).

9) CFL’s interfere with radio and hi-fi equipment.

If you listen to short wave radios, sure. But I’m guessing you listen to FM radio or watch TV. They don’t mess with signals that high in the spectrum. They might mess with AM radio, but Rush is on in the daytime, so I’m guessing it won’t matter much (no, I don’t listen to Rush).

As an amateur radio operator and a studio engineer, I can say that I’ve not experienced interference on my radio or studio equipment. But I’ve also left my radio station and my recording studio with incandescents.

Again… CFL’s are great, but not the perfect choice for every light socket.

Summary
CFL’s are not going to replace every incandescent light bulb. They’re not perfect. But with electric rates going sky-high, it’s making more financial sense to switch.

My electric bill runs about $200 a month on the budget plan (where they average out the last 12 months) and Illinois’ electric rates are practically doubling, so I had to do something. I just wish I didn’t have to wait another 12 months to see a difference, but I should get a pretty healthy credit balance on my bill if this pans out.

I’m also vehemently opposed to the government actually banning incandescents. I have enough places in my house where I don’t want any CFL’s (studio, radio shack, outdoors), that it doesn’t make practical sense to ban them out right.

But it also doesn’t make sense to write off CFL’s based on their short-comings. They certainly have their place in our homes. If we all changed the light bulbs in the fixtures we overuse, we could not only reduce our electric rates, but reduce the demand we’re placing the electric grid. I’m not exactly “Mr. Green,” but consuming less certainly won’t hurt anyone.

Posted in Technobabble

Don’t you understand me?

February 6, 2007

By day, I’m a middleware developer (software that connects software), and I have an RSS news subscription to IBM’s Websphere MQ update news site.  Basically, it’s a news feed that announces fixes and updates to their messaging queuing software (formally called MQSeries).  Here’s the title to one of the updates today:

SE10763: MQM400-MSGAMQ5615 STRMQM FAILS WITH AMQ5615 AFTER AMQZXMA0 FAILS MCH0601 IN FUNCTION RFXADDCLQMGR

Um, yea… did you get that?  It’s pretty much like that every day.  Several times a day.

That just cracks me up.  Of course, it worries me a bit that I actually understand most of what that’s saying.  However, I’m finding that I have to gloss over the 20+ announcements I get each day from this that site since I can hardly read the headlines.  Didn’t IBM get the memo on typing in all caps??

I guess this is IBM, the “Lord of the Acronyms.”

Posted in Technobabble

Forget Google - Oracle’s Taking Over

February 10, 2006

It seems Oracle has its eyes on the JBoss folks:

Oracle’s Open-Source Shopping Spree

I wonder what this means for hibernate?

According to the article, they have they’re eyes on Zend, too - the maker of the runtime engine used by PHP. Given the market share that PHP represents, this could be very interesting. This is all very interesting, too, when you consider the massive layoffs at Oracle.

Posted in Technobabble

Spindle 4T4 to be bundled with Eclipse WTP

February 9, 2006

http://jroller.com/page/glongman?entry=eclipse_wtp_and_tapestry_4

The next generation of Spindle (the Eclipse plugin for Tapestry development) is going to be bundled with the Eclipse “Web Tools Plugin” (WTP). What does that mean? I’m not sure. The Spindle guy was a little vague on that. I’d have to guess that either he’ll be putting the two together in his own Eclipse distribution, or the WTP folks are sucking his plugin into their distribution. That later would be the coolest.

Posted in Technobabble

XHTML 2.0 line breaks

January 18, 2006

It seems that the XHTML 2.0 spec has removed the line break tag (<br>) from the spec all together. When I first heard this from Chris, I was really confused. The BR tag, while problematic, is a rather essential to getting a page to “look” right. I know that the CSS purists seem to hate the BR tag and find ways around using it (involving lists and paragraphs - a worse perversion than using tables for layouts in my humble opinion), but how would someone do a simple salutation in a BR’less world?

<p>
Thank you,<br/>
Paul Kimbrel<br/>
Programmer Extraordinaire<br/>
</p>

Without BR’s, you’d have to do something goofy involving marginless paragraphs or unordered lists. Ugh. Well, I just couldn’t believe they (the W3c) could pull a stunt like that with out a better solution. So, I looked up the spec myself.

Fortunately, they’re not leaving us in the lurch. Even better, the solution is far more elegant. They’re introducing some new tags to the spec and the one pertaining to this issue is the line tag: <l> Yep. Just “L”.

<p>
<l>Thank you,</l>
<l>Paul Kimbrel</l>
<l>Programmer Extraordinaire</l>
</p>

Now, we have more control over line spacing in general. Plus, we have more continuity in the DOM structure.

Posted in Technobabble

About stink’n time!

September 22, 2005

Slashdot.org has finally drunk the CSS coolaid and gotten with the program:

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/22/1324207

The set loads infinitely faster now, and even looks a bit cleaner. Very nice…

Posted in Technobabble

Yea for clustering in tomcat!

July 25, 2005

Well, it only took a week to find on little crucial line missing in my tomcat configuration. I’ve been spending obscene amounts of time trying to get a simple tomcat cluster up and running for fail-over testing and tonight - it actually worked. It’s pretty slick how I can just drop one of the servers and my tapestry sessions still work. Bring the dead server back up and *poof* it starts processing requests.

It was quite frustrating trying to wade through the thousands of posts on how to cluster (98% of which didn’t pertain to what I was trying to do). I also find it amazing that if I followed what most of these sites said to do, I’d still be scratching my head trying to figure things out.

My goal: failover.

(more…)

Posted in Technobabble

Powered by WordPress